The Final Version!
PRESENTATION RANKINGS
These rankings are based on students' peer evaluation sheets, and they are not necessarilyevaluated the same way by the instructor of this class. Yet, presentations are not only for the
teacher but also for your audience. And these rankings show how well these people
communicated with their audience in their speeches. Congratulations!!! I hope many of you
will appear in these rankings.
SPEECH 2 "SHOW AND TELL" (June 4, 2004)
1. Y. Watanabe (Average Score = 21.1 out of 25.0) pic01 pic02 pic03 pic042. Hatta (20.7) pic01 pic02 pic03
3. Oka (20.5) pic01 pic02 pic03
4. Yaguchi (20.2) pic01 pic02 pic03
5. M. Watanabe (19.9) pic01 pic02 pic03
When you look at your speech in the video, look at these people's
presentations too! You can learn a lot from good presentations.
SPEECH 3 "BOOK/MOVIE REVIEW" (June 11, 2004)
1. Oka (28.8 out of 35.0)2. Yaguchi (28.7)
3. Sakurai (27.5)
4. Y. Watanabe (27.2)
5. Hatta (27.0)
As you can see, we see some chnage in the ranking. BUT (!) the difference
in scores is very small. Yes, it was a close race!!! They all gave very
good presentations.
SPEECH 4 "INTRODUCTION" of Final Presentation (June 18, 2004)
1.Yaguchi and Y. Watanabe (39.8 out of 50.0)3. Hatta (39.2)
4. Shinoda (39.1)
5. Yokoyama (38.6)
Note that the class average was 36.5. This means it was again a very
close race!!!
SPEECH 4 "REHEARSAL" of Final Presentation (June 21 & 25, 2004)
1. Hatta (41.9 out of 50.0)2. Y. Watanabe (41.8)
3. Sanpei (40.5)
4. M. Watanabe (40.1)
5. Ishikawa (39.7)
6. Oka and Yaguchi (39.7)
8. Matsumoto (39.3)
9. Shirai (39.2)
10. Miki (38.4)
This is the final ranking for this semester. Congratulations!
Note that the class average was 37.1. Again, it was mostly a
very close race. As I said in the last class, peak yourself in your
final presentation. You need to look at all presentation handouts
and prepare well. Good luck!!!